The senate on Tuesday rose from about two-hour executive session on
Wednesday and announced the suspension of its planned process to
override President Goodluck Jonathan’s veto on the Fourth Alteration Act
2015 which seeks to further amend the 1999 Constitution.
Senate President, David Mark, who addressed the chamber after the
closed-door session, said the senators as lawmakers, would always abide
by the law of the land, since the Supreme Court had asked the federal
parliament to stay further action on the document.
Mark said,”We are law makers, we will not be law breakers. In fact we
are responsible senior citizens who should not be seen to be breaking
laws in one way or the other.
“However the executive should not take the National Assembly for granted any longer.”
The senators had on Tuesday vowed to begin the process of overriding
the President’s veto today, by taking the first reading of the bill to
adopt the gazette of the controversial amendment Bill.
It will be recalled that Jonathan had in a letter dated April 13,
addressed to Senate President David Mark and Speaker of the House of
Representatives, Mr. Aminu Tambuwal, announced his decision to reject
the Constitution (Alteration) Bill 2015.
He had cited perceived deliberate attempts by federal lawmakers to
whittle down presidential powers and their failure to strictly adhere to
constitutional provisions on the amendments to Section 9 of the
constitution by observing four-fifths majority support in each chamber
before it could amend it.
The president had further argued that the National Assembly only
observed two-thirds majority support for the amendment instead of
four-fifths stipulation in the constitution before amending the section.
The amendment to the section strips the president of the power to sign an amendment bill before becoming effective.
Following the president’s letter, the Senate on April 15 demanded the
return of the bill to the National Assembly by the president.
The demand was the fallout of an allegation that the president had
earlier signed the bill before he was prevailed upon by the AGF to
withdraw his assent.
Suspecting that the National Assembly might move to override the
president’s veto as a result of the demand, the federal government
proceeded to the Supreme Court to stop the National Assembly from
further carrying out any legislation on the amendment bill with the
intention to render it handicapped.
The Supreme Court eventually ruled on the suit on May 7, asking the
National Assembly to maintain the status quo ante on the amendment until
the final determination of the suit.
It also described the suit as incompetent, saying it should have been
between the president and the National Assembly and not between the AGF
and the National Assembly as the case had been.
The apex court also queried the federal government’s counsel for not
joining the state houses of assembly in the suit since they were also
part of the amendment process.